For this reason, robot manufacturers probably won’t change the fundamentals of their programming languages. Selling spare parts and additional options is probably as lucrative as selling new robots. Thus, robot manufacturers have to offer backward compatibility. The reason why robot-programming languages evolve slowly is probably due to the fact that industrial robots are extremely reliable and durable. As a result, sometimes manufacturers end up with robots of different brands. Furthermore, a number of businesses work with calls for tenders. Stäubli, for example, is one of the few manufacturers that offer robots suitable for humid environments, while FANUC is the only one to offer a medium-payload collaborative robot. Unfortunately, industrial robot manufacturers don’t offer completely equivalent product ranges, and their offers evolve constantly. The truth is that some robots are still programmed in assembler-like languages.īecause of the complexity of using an industrial robot, robot integrators and most manufacturers try to limit themselves to a single robot brand. You might think that a robot program looks like C++ or Visual Basic. The way you program an industrial robot strongly depends on the robot brand. This is definitely not the case for industrial robots. If you have a Windows PC, the user interface won’t be affected by your computer hardware. If you drive a car, it makes little difference what brand it is: all cars are driven the same way.
0 kommentar(er)
